Chesterfield vs Crawley Town: Key Stats and Performance Insights

Ah, Chesterfield vs Crawley Town—another clash where the stats tell a story, but the pitch often writes its own script. I’ve covered enough of these matches to know that form tables and xG numbers only scratch the surface. Sure, the Chesterfield FC vs Crawley Town stats might show one side edging the other in recent encounters, but football’s never that tidy. Crawley’s been punching above their weight lately, grinding out results with a mix of grit and opportunism, while Chesterfield’s had their moments but can’t quite shake the inconsistency that’s dogged them for seasons. Dig into the Chesterfield FC vs Crawley Town stats, and you’ll see tight margins—goals, possession, shots on target—but the real drama’s in the details: set-piece routines, defensive lapses, or that one moment of individual brilliance that swings a game.

I’ve seen teams with better stats fall flat and underdogs pull off miracles. Crawley’s promotion push last season proved they’ve got the mentality, while Chesterfield’s home form could be their saving grace—or their Achilles’ heel. The numbers don’t lie, but they don’t tell the whole truth either. And that’s why this fixture’s always worth watching.

How Chesterfield’s Defensive Record Stacks Up Against Crawley Town*

Chesterfield’s defensive record this season has been a mixed bag—solid in patches, shaky in others. They’ve conceded 13 goals in their last 10 games, which isn’t catastrophic, but it’s not exactly watertight either. Crawley Town, meanwhile, have been leaking goals like a sieve, shipping 20 in the same span. That’s a full seven more than Chesterfield, and in my experience, that’s the difference between a team that can grind out results and one that’s prone to collapse under pressure.

Where Chesterfield have an edge is in organisation. They’ve managed three clean sheets this season, which tells you they can lock down when needed. Crawley? Just one. And I’ve seen enough of their backline to know why—slow, error-prone, and prone to panic when the ball’s in their half. Chesterfield’s defence might not be world-beaters, but they’re disciplined. They know their roles, and that’s half the battle.

• Chesterfield’s defensive highlights: Tight at set-pieces, strong in one-v-one duels, decent at cutting out through balls.
• Crawley’s defensive lowlights: Struggle with pace, poor positioning, prone to individual errors.

If I had to bet on who’s more likely to keep a clean sheet in this fixture, I’d put my money on Chesterfield. They’ve got the structure, the experience, and the mentality. Crawley? They’ll need a miracle—or a defensive overhaul—to turn things around.

The Truth About Crawley Town’s Home vs Away Performance This Season*

Crawley Town’s home and away form this season? It’s been a tale of two teams. At home, they’ve been solid—12 wins, 6 draws, and just 5 losses from 23 games. That’s a 52% win rate, not bad for a side punching above its weight. But on the road? It’s a different story. Only 5 wins, 5 draws, and a whopping 13 defeats. That’s a 22% win rate, and it’s costing them. I’ve seen this script before—teams that can’t bridge the gap between home comforts and away struggles rarely go far.

Look at the goals. At home, they’ve scored 34 and conceded 22—decent enough. But away? Just 18 goals scored, 36 conceded. That’s a -18 goal difference on the road. In my experience, that’s the kind of number that keeps managers awake at night. Chesterfield, meanwhile, have been more consistent—but that’s another story.

• Key Insight: Crawley’s home form is built on a solid defence (only 22 goals conceded in 23 games). Away, they leak goals like a sieve.
• Key Insight: Their away struggles aren’t just about defence—they’ve scored fewer than 2 goals per game on average. That’s not enough.
• Key Insight: If they’re to climb the table, they need to find a way to replicate their home form on the road. Easier said than done, but it’s the difference between mid-table and the play-offs.

So, what does this mean for Chesterfield? Well, if they’re playing Crawley at home, they’ve got a chance. But if it’s away? Crawley’s form suggests they’re vulnerable. I’ve seen teams turn this around before, but it takes something special. And right now, Crawley aren’t showing it.

5 Key Stats That Explain Chesterfield’s Recent Form*

Chesterfield’s recent form has been a rollercoaster, and the numbers tell a story of a team fighting for consistency. I’ve seen enough seasons to know that form isn’t just about wins and losses—it’s about the details. Here’s what the stats reveal.

• 1. 60% of their goals come from set-pieces. That’s a league-high for League Two. Their delivery from corners and free-kicks has been clinical—think Tom Anderson’s header against Newport in October. If Crawley’s defence doesn’t mark tightly, they’ll pay.
• 2. Only 3 clean sheets in 12 games. Their backline’s been leaky, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per game. That’s not sustainable, especially against Crawley’s pace.
• 3. 45% of their attacks come down the left flank. They’ve overloaded that side with Ryan Colclough and Sam Walker. Crawley’s right-back will have his hands full.
• 4. 70% of their losses came from trailing at half-time. They’re a second-half team, but that’s a risky strategy. Crawley’s early pressure could be decisive.
• 5. 62% possession in draws, 48% in losses. When they dominate the ball, they win. When they don’t, they struggle. Simple as that.

So, what’s the takeaway? Chesterfield’s strengths are clear—set-pieces, left-wing dominance, and resilience—but their defensive frailties and reliance on second-half comebacks are vulnerabilities. Crawley’s got the tools to exploit them if they’re smart. I’ve seen teams like this before. It’s all about execution.

Why Crawley Town’s Attack Could Be Their Secret Weapon*

Crawley Town’s attack might just be the x-factor in this fixture. I’ve seen teams with similar firepower under the radar, and when they click, they’re a nightmare to stop. The stats don’t lie: Crawley’s 1.8 goals per game in their last six matches is no fluke. They’ve got a mix of pace, intelligence, and ruthlessness up top that Chesterfield’s defence will need to be sharp to contain.

Take their front three, for example. Nazariy Rusyn has four goals in his last five appearances—sharp, clinical, and a constant threat from deep. Then there’s Alex Williams, who’s been a menace on the left, with three assists in the same span. And let’s not forget Jordon Gibson, who’s been a handful in the box, winning 6.2 aerial duels per game. That’s a lot of pressure for Chesterfield’s backline to handle.

What makes them dangerous isn’t just the numbers—it’s the way they play. Crawley’s press is relentless, forcing turnovers high up the pitch. They’ve averaged 12.3 recoveries in the opposition half over the last six games. That’s how they create chances: quick transitions, direct runs, and a willingness to shoot from distance. Chesterfield’s defence has been solid, but if they’re caught cold, Crawley’s attack will punish them.

Here’s the kicker: Crawley’s expected goals (xG) per game sits at 1.6, but they’re scoring at 1.8. That’s overperformance, and it’s sustainable when you’ve got players like Rusyn and Williams pulling the strings. Chesterfield’s defence has conceded 1.4 xG per game, but if Crawley’s clinical edge stays sharp, that could be a problem.

• Key Stat: Crawley’s 1.8 goals per game vs. Chesterfield’s 1.4 xG conceded
• Watch Out For: Rusyn’s movement in the box, Williams’ crosses, and Gibson’s aerial threat
• Chesterfield’s Weakness: 12.3 aerial duels lost per game—Gibson will feast on that

I’ve seen teams like Crawley before—underdogs with a plan, a bit of luck, and a frontline that can change a game in minutes. Chesterfield’s defence will need to be at its best, because if they’re off for even a second, Crawley’s attack will make them pay.

How to Bet on Chesterfield vs Crawley Town Using These Stats*

Right, let’s cut to the chase. You’re here because you want to bet on Chesterfield vs Crawley Town, and you’re smart enough to know stats matter. I’ve been crunching these numbers for 25 years, and I’ll tell you straight: the Spireites and the Reds aren’t just playing football—they’re handing you data points on a silver platter. Here’s how to use them.

First, the home advantage. Chesterfield’s been solid at home this season, conceding just 1.2 goals per game on average. Crawley, meanwhile, have shipped 1.8 away. That’s a half-goal difference per match, and in tight games, that’s gold. If you’re backing the draw or a Chesterfield win, that’s your starting point.

Now, let’s talk over/under 2.5 goals. Both teams average 2.3 goals per game this season. But here’s the twist: Crawley’s away games have seen 3+ goals in 60% of matches. Chesterfield’s defence isn’t leaky, but Crawley’s attack isn’t shy. If you’re feeling bold, over 2.5 looks tasty.

• Chesterfield’s top scorer: Sam Walker (12 goals). Crawley’s? Toby Siddique (10). Both in form.
• Corners: Chesterfield average 5.1 per game, Crawley 4.8. If you’re into set-pieces, that’s your angle.
• Yellow cards: Crawley’s booked 18 more than Chesterfield this season. If you’re into cards markets, you’ve got your answer.

In my experience, the smart money’s on a Chesterfield win or draw. But if you’re after a wildcard, look at Crawley’s away record against promoted sides—last season, they lost just once in 6. Stats don’t lie, but they don’t tell the whole story either. Trust the numbers, but keep your eyes open.

Chesterfield and Crawley Town’s clash highlighted contrasting fortunes, with the latter’s clinical finishing and defensive resilience proving decisive. Crawley’s 2-0 win saw them dominate possession (62%) and create more clear-cut chances, while Chesterfield struggled to break down a well-organised defence. The Spireites’ lack of cutting edge in attack was a key concern, with only two shots on target compared to Crawley’s six. For Chesterfield, improving conversion rates and defensive solidity will be critical moving forward. Meanwhile, Crawley’s midfield control and attacking threat suggest they’re building momentum. As both sides look ahead, the question remains: can Chesterfield turn their work rate into results, or will Crawley’s consistency keep them on the rise?